We recognize our responsibility to correct errors that we have previously published.
Our policy is to consider refutations (readers’ criticisms) of primary research
papers, and to publish them (in concise form) if and only if the author provides
compelling evidence that a major claim of the original paper was incorrect. Refutations
are peer-reviewed, and where possible they are sent to the same referees who reviewed
the original paper. A copy is usually also sent to the corresponding author of the
original paper for signed comments. Refutations are typically published in the Communications
sometimes with a brief response from the original authors. Some submitted refutations
are eventually published as retractions by the paper’s authors.
Complaints, disagreements over interpretation and other matters arising should be
addressed to the editor of the journals. Because debates over interpretation are
often inconclusive, we do not automatically consider criticisms of review articles
or other secondary material, and in the event that we decide to publish such a criticism
we do not necessarily consult the original authors. Editorial decisions in such
cases are based on considerations of reader interest, novelty of arguments, integrity
of the publication record and fairness to the parties involved. Publication may
take various forms at the discretion of the editor. WRA considers correspondence
relating to all review-type articles.
Corrections are published for significant errors in non-peer-reviewed content of
WRA journals at the discretion of the editors. Readers who have identified such
an error should send an email to the general email address of the journal, clearly
stating the publication reference, title, author and section of the article, briefly
explaining the error.
WRA operates the following policy for making corrections to the print and online
versions of their peer-reviewed content.
Publishable amendments that affect the publication record and/or the scientific
accuracy of published information are published online in the journal. Four categories
of amendments are relevant for peer-reviewed material: Erratum or Publisher Correction,
Corrigendum or Author Correction, Retraction or Addendum. All four correction types
are bi-directionally linked to the original published paper.
|